This project is actually delayed as of most recent monthly update:
Maybe nowâs a good time for me to share this: Free workload optimisation | Not Quite Unicorns
This project is actually delayed as of most recent monthly update:
Maybe nowâs a good time for me to share this: Free workload optimisation | Not Quite Unicorns
my bad mghatiya, I posted before re-checking the roadmap and like George pointed out, in the monthly community update it was actually announced it was getting paused
Where is HAR button?
Thatâs a good thing you have there GeorgeâŚ
imagine being new and seeing 0.0001 for this and 0.05 for that, and 0.03 for this if itâs not that and if it is than itâs 0.002 for this and thatâŚ
what the hell is all that?
Who that is new (that cares) can calculate all that?
Iâve never seen anything like it.
Hopefully, I can figure it all out and get there.
Myself, I think itâs a little crazy.
But, apparently, someone at the top of Bubble sees things differently.
I hope things work out.
Surely, without pausing the change of pricing, right?
Because Bubble feels WU optimisations, tools to analyse, debugging etc. are not connected to price change at all. And the day they add all those tools, all the apps must get optimised automatically.
And now once the new pricing kicks in, Bubble will have all the incentive to keep this project paused even longer, as WU optimisations means less revenue!
So out of curiosity, I tested bubbleâs backend perf by updating 10000 rows. Jesus.
https://x.com/YaokaiJiang/status/1831480841010344016
78 seconds, 1.5 USD⌠(well the 1.5 USD shouldnât really be a surprise to me I guess, as the 0.3USD/1000WU was listed)
What is the migration you speak of
Old projects will be migrated to the current billing system by oct 1st.
If you started your projects after the introduction of the current billing system then this shouldnât affect you.
Itâs like Tesla
We in Brazil donât have X anymore
Comparing it to Netlifyâs pricing, they offer 100GB of bandwith on the Starter FREE tier. Now I understand that netlify and bubble are two very different things and that bubble needs to make a profit on the tool that they provide. However, they are both technically re-packagers of AWS and offer a simplified development environment. Bubble should cost more, definitely. However, I find it hard to take Bubble as a replacement to very much at that pricing. To me it seems suitable for MVPâs and prototypes, but not much more.
Netlify is just a frontend hosting platform.
Bubble is dev + hosting, so yeah, not quite apples to apples.
Though the most expensive thing in bubble is not bandwidth (bandwidth is always cheap), it is backend workflows, which netlify does not even address.
It does address that, netlify isnât just frontend - itâs both. You can create an entire nextjs app and even use serverless functions (endpoints). You must connect your own database though
I didnât know netlify has serverless functions. Thanks!
In my mind though backend is mostly about shared data handling, essentially some kind of database. Without that, it is not possible to distribute shared state. (since there isnât any).
Wonder at what point netlify will add that capability.
Netlify, like most providers, simply allow you to chose your own database and manage it via REST
Correct:
The best posts about WU are from an actual statistician who describes why the statistical methods theyâre using are flawed.
This guy: Summary - aaronsheldon - Bubble Forum