it is really really bad
At least make few changes, viable icons, button + icon, dont reload the page entirely something
Maybe you can explain more? Maybe rhat you don’t know how to design good looking link? You can easily use group, icon with link… but maybe you shouldnuse navigate to page instead to avoid refresh and in this case text element or button will give you better result
I have an SPA because everything every plugin every unnecessary stuff and more loads on page load and each load is slow, and due to having an SPA I can’t use link element that reloads page entirely the issue is I have two very bad options, I will hide the link behind the text, or I will move the link beneath the element using align to parent. or I will move floating group to beneath the page and stuff the links there, or I will have a footer which I don’t want to dont fit on my design.
I can do almost every design and solve almost all bubble related problems but when it comes to shady things I dont like them, it is not cloaking but it is hidden text/content, risky stuff.
If you have any viable solutions or another view that supports that this is not risky and works, gladly appreciated
My conclusion is this, solution1 - dead end - solution 2 - dead end - solution 3- dead end - solution 4 - some conundrums, Bubble solves nothing important. NOTHING
Place link and text in align to parent container. Place both in center. Bring text to front. Send link to back. When text is clicked run go to page action. Make link transparent, so is visible on page for the link to get picked up by google crawlers for SEO. And if worried the transparent color will affect crawler, just make same color as text since text with same formatting as link should sit above and not cause visual issue for user.
1 Like
Here my main 2 concerns,
- Will I get penalized for that ? it is not cloaking but it is hidden text
- Using that on an icon now, when mobile I use icon, there is no viable icons on links, I use material icons so I cant overlap, I need to move it behind a group, will my link get less value ?. (+ this way is some sort of hidden text)
No penalty because it’s not hidden and actually is visible.
If use icon on mobile, set link element to use icon, there is a checkbox for it.
1 Like
here cant use
Set link text to [font=Material Icons]favorite[/font]
You can replace favorite with font name of choice
1 Like
Yes problem 1 is now solved, what about the other one, cloaking is when a browser serves different to bots and user-agents, so it is not cloaking. But it is a form of hidden text. There is 2 possibility here 1) Google sees as hidden text and deceptive move 2) it sees as bad practice and lowers the quality of the link. What do you think of that ?
The previous replies is what I think. You can maybe find information more reliable than me online or through chatGPT
I dig really deep, AI is unreliable for this, it first said cloaking after hidden text, but overall it fits for the malpractice or bad practice really. So low quality link is the real concern here.
You have been pushing this align to parent idea for 3 years now. You are reliable and assume you have tried this before. What do you think about low quality link thing, because of z index.
This doesn’’t work by the way, only works on editor
Works when I test it in preview
I’ve never experienced seeing any report about my usage of it. My on page SEO scores show 100, best practices 100…unless Google testing tools report different than their live page crawlers
I solved it no problems.
How did you solve it, what was the solution you came up with?
Didn’t find any solution on the forum, it is the combination of custom html element, js2bubble, and prevention of the html element link I construccted to actually not going to that link but triggering workflow, then converted to a reusable, now I have the perfect link where I want.
Hopefully…
Nice. Thanks for sharing. Very interesting concept. It is better for accessibility, and same for SEO alone, so overall, better for SEO as it incorporates a better accessibility standard.