Is there a way to sort $ amount values that have more than 1 comma?
Date sorts seem to be thrown off by records with empty date values (it sorts the first group of records, then seems to reset). Is there a way to fix this?
I see a fair amount of requests to be able to edit in the table directly. Iâd pay 2x-3x current price for that feature. Is this on the roadmap at all?
@satismaxhk I will send you a PM with a demo that showcases how to use a dropdown to filter values in the grid and I will send you some instructions to share your editor so I can look into the error
Weâve run into a data refresh issue that Iâm hoping you can help with.
When we have auto-refresh on, the grid gets jumpy as our various users update associated data. So, if you have the list open and someone happens to update a record in that list, the grid resets.
So we disabled auto-refresh and are doing a manual re-render as needed when users interact on the screen (i.e. change a filter). This works until the underlying data changes at which point it compromises the integrity of the list. In other words, they click on one record and it opens a completely different record since the underlying list changed.
Weâve explored the concept of using states, but have signficant concerns about the potential performance degradation and would rather avoid.
In general, it will be hard to prevent this issue as the âdo a search forâ will always auto update with new data. A way to fix this is to use states, as the data in a state is static.
As this is part a UI challenge, you could also display a warning with a refresh button when another user changed the data in the table. Or refresh the table instantly and display a message after that.
Maybe you could share some details about your current setup (e.g. screenshots) via a PM so I can see if there could be further optimization
Is there a way to stop the rows expanding the entire height of the table, if they are the only data added/re-sizing themselves. Iâd love to have âfixed-heightâ rows when using a âfixed heightâ table, keeping the pagination at the bottom.
@aaron.jacobs Right now this is the default behavior. I looked into this and it appears to be hard to add a feature that maxes these rows a fixed width. I have added this feature to my list to look into later
Update 2.55.0 & 2.55.1
Added workflow actions to select and deselect all checkboxes:
@konrad1 Turn âDo not refresh tableâ on. That way the table will not update automatically. If you still want to update the table, you can refresh the table manually by using the âre-renderâ workflow action
@konrad1 Yes, exactly what Thimo mentions in his response. Check the âDo not refresh tableâ option and then manually re-render within your workflows. Works like a charm for those situations where auto-update interferes with your process.
Weâve set it up so that interactions on the screen trigger the re-render as needed, so our grids stay updated despite not being auto-refreshed. We also have a refresh button available next to all grids and have trained our users to refresh if they donât see the data they expect to see.
Morning!
Is there a method for the following -
Setting the MAX height of a data row (without changing padding)
or
Preventing the height expansion of a row when it is the only row within the table.
Right now this option is not yet available for the plugin. It is already on my list to look into though! What you can do is set up a condition to change the height of the whole table when you have a small number of rows
wondering if you can assist me with correct syntax or point me in the right direction.
I have your grid display information for a roster. Its is a list of shifts (called ReturnedSolves) which has a start and end time, a field saying if its a day or night roster and a link to the staff table (called MSCO) which holds their names and disciplines.
The roster looks like this which is fantastic, but itâs displaying data out of order.
The problem is the day and night shifts donât match the user. They just fill up the rows from top to bottom.
I realise Im not noting in the search for shift the MSCO (or staff member ) thatâs being searched for to match correctly. Its should be something like this
but I donât know how to match the operator to the table im searching.
So my question is am I approaching the problem correctly in the first place or is there a way I can link the ID of the Rowâs MSCOâs and reference them in the query?
You will need to make sure your newly added columns have the same number of data points as your ânameâ column. (Be careful using âunique elementsâ as all columns need to contain the same number of data points and that operator can cause one columns to have fewer data points than others)
If you are still having issues, could you send me a PM with a link to your editor (with editing permissions)? That way I can take a look if I can fix it for you. Thanks!