I have a workflow that has multiple conditions where all of them must be passed in order to be executed.
They are build in a way that
A and B and C and D and ( E and F )
Where letters are conditional statements A = (ex. address isn’t empty)
But in the end I have a statement in the brackets that I need condition E to be true only if condition F is true.
The situation like this is an effect that only a specific type of customer requires and additional document to be checked. But if the customer is not this type of a customer it shouldn’t be required.
So I expect:
When E is false and F is true = false
When E is false and F is false = true (I don’t care about E in that case)
When E is true and F is true = true
When E is true and F is false = false
This works great on error proofing flow where I have
~A or ~B or ~C or ~D or (~E and ~F).
But I cannot replicate the same to “and” chain as it creates a situation that if both are negative it creates a negative. - which stops my flow.
Proposed solution:
I am looking how to make this statement go like this as this is my idea to make this work:
A and B and C and D and (E as bolean = F as bolean)
Just don’t know how to reach bolean froom ex. Dropdown contains X and Customer has Option 1 selected.
How do you come to some solution like those?