Operater: opposite of "Contains list"! Please

Can we have an operator: “doesnt contain list”?

(When a list DOESNT contain ALL the items of another list)


Is second this!

You can use the :intersects with operator which gives you a yes/no depending on how many “items in common” you want between the two lists.

You can make it look for a dynamic number so you can do List1:intersects with List2:count List1:count

So it would need every item in List1 in the list of List2 to output a “yes”

1 Like

The purpose of the “does not contain” tyler is it’s done server side, not client side. Speed benefit. Intersects with is part of advanced filter which is notoriously slow.

1 Like